Should Congress Remove The Judge Who Blocked Trump’s Executive Order To Defund Sanctuary Cities?

US. District Court Judge William Orrick has done it again. Orrick has become a central figure in the Trump ‘resistance,’ having thwarted the president on three separate occasions with overreaching rulings that defy the executive branch. Many argue that Orrick has overstepped his bounds and gone too far. Others are calling for his impeachment.

First, Orrick and his fellow judges in the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals blocked President Trump’s lawful travel ban order. Now Orrick is going after Trump’s plan to defund sanctuary cities. On Monday Orrick “permanently blocked” President Trump’s executive order that would have stopped federal funding from flowing into sanctuary cities:

“’The Counties have demonstrated that the Executive Order has caused and will cause them constitutional injuries by violating the separation of powers doctrine and depriving them of their Tenth and Fifth Amendment rights,’ the judge wrote in his order.”

But the DOJ is fighting back:

“‘The District Court exceeded its authority today when it barred the President from instructing his cabinet members to enforce existing law,’ a Department of Justice spokesman said in a statement. “The Justice Department will vindicate the President’s lawful authority to direct the executive branch.”

And not only that but he has raised money for Barack Obama in the past, showing he is no impartial judge. He raised over $230,000 for the former president:

“Orrick was nominated to his position by hardline abortion supporter President Barack Obama. He was also a major donor to and bundler for President Obama’s presidential campaign. He raised at least $200,000 for Obama and donated $30,800 to committees supporting him, according to Public Citizen.”

A judge does not necessarily need to commit a crime in order to be impeached. Ballotpedia explains:

“The United States Senate has removed judges from office for substantial questionable conduct, even if no crime was committed. For example, Judge Robert Wodrow Archbald was impeached and removed from office for improper business relationships with litigants. One reason for this may be the life tenure bestowed upon federal judges and the Congress’ place in upholding the good behavior of judges.”

The last federal judge to be impeached was in 2010 when Bill Clinton appointee Thomas Porteous of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana was impeached for bribery and perjury.

So is it time for Orrick to go?

VOTE:

Should Congress Remove The Judge Who Blocked Trump’s Executive Order To Defund Sanctuary Cities?

BREAKING: ISRAEL HAS ENOUGH, BOMBS THE HELL OUT OF ISIS. DO YOU SUPPORT ISRAEL?

The one nation that the US has always been able to rely on in the Middle East is Israel; with a long history of cooperation and support in the area, it has always been a focal point for division among those that are pro-Palestinian. And although recent developments with the US and Syria seem to be showing a more determined attitude in protecting pour allies, the Israelis themselves have decided to take matters into their own hands.
After ISIS began firing rockets directly into Israeli settlements, the Israeli military responded with a devastating mass bombing using armed drones. Whilst the ISIS casualty list only numbered one ISIS fighter dead, the message was heard loudly and clearly: Israel will not sit by as we are attacked.
Although claiming to support Israel, under the Obama administration, most pro-Israel votes in the UN were either voted against by America or abstained from;

this is not how we should be showing our support. And last year’s USAID budget showed that of the $51 Billion total foreign aid, whilst $3.5 Billion went to Israel to help wit defence, MORE than this went to nations that suround Israel to help fund their military.
Despite being called an “Ally”, the US has in fact been funding and creating tensions in the area to suit its own purposes. Perhaps with a new President at the helm, it may just be the starting point of a real relationship and support to end the attacks against the last Jewish stronghold left. So far, Trump has made very positive overtures towards Israel and has expressed public support openly; let’s see where it leads.
Israel is our closest ally in the Middle East, and they need our support, Patriots.
ISIS was caught firing rockets into Israeli settlements, so Israel responded with a massive bombing from an armed drone, killing at least one ISIS fighter. (via Ynet News).

Egypt was quick to declare a state of emergency after learning of the attack. Egypt should have been aware of these terrorist organizations hiding out in their country. Egypt has been too soft on terrorism.
Patriots, we should be grateful Israel is willing to take action. Finally, the world is starting to fight back against this vile organization rather than tolerate its violence. The left would have you believe that Israel is a violent nation, and that they should coexist with their neighbors. Only an irrational person could believe that ISIS and their sponsors could ever live in peace with the great nation of Israel.
Thankfully, we have a president who committed to rebuilding relations with Israel. We need to support Israel because they are the only reasonable nation in the Middle East. The Israelites are not murdering homosexuals or abusing women. They are simply trying to exist in peace.

For eight years, Obama has tried to force Israel to accept Palestine, despite Palestine’s aggressive and violent actions. Obama did not like Israel, and we know this because one of the very last executive actions he undertook before leaving office was to send this violent would-be nation $221 million dollars of our taxpayer money! (via AP).
It is important to remember that Palestine does not care for America or our great values. They want to take all of Israeli territory from our most important ally. The Palestinians have shown that they are more comfortable with violence than diplomacy, and for some reason, Obama favored the Palestinians over the Israelites.
Why was Obama so committed to anti-American policies? We can only speculate, but it is clear he did not care for us patriots. Thankfully, we now have a president committed to taking care of the American people. We have a president that is dedicated to making sure veterans are cared for.

It is reassuring to know that we have such a strong ally in the Middle East. We need to support them as they push back against terrorists and hostile nations, like Palestine and Iran. It is amazing that Israel has flourished in such a trouble region of the world.
President Trump has shown that he willing to work with Israel, and this is important. President Trump and President Netanyahu are great friends, and we have already started to rebuild a great relationship with an important ally.
It is important that we support President Trump, and it is important that we push back against liberal apologists. We cannot allow the left to influence international policy in the manner that Obama did. If we do that, then we will never make America great again.
The Democrats are furious that we have reestablished great relations with Israel. They are furious we support our allies rather than turn our backs on them. We need to make sure the left and their establishment friends do not torpedo our strong stance in the world.

 

Obama Caught Red-Handed! New Damning Report Reveals Barack Broke Federal Law While President — Should He Go To Jail?

Conservatives sometimes give up too soon or too easily. And it’s understandable. Yet this is just what the left wants. More specifically, it’s just what liberal politicians accused of corruption want. If conservatives will just go away, they figure they might be able to skate fast over thin ice. That can’t be allowed to happen.

The administration of justice should not depend on one’s political party. Sadly, it often does. There are scarce other reasons to explain the fact that Bill and Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and their allies have not even been indicted. It’s easy to question whether these people will ever have their day in court.

Yet that day might come. The conservative public-interest law firm, Judicial Watch, is relentless in its pursuit of corruption. In fact, it has discovered criminal activity by Mr. Obama’s EPA. It looks like EPA officials used social media to push its agenda. That might not sound like the most serious crime, but have patience. It’s just one step closer to names such as Clinton, Podesta, Abedin, and Obama. Specifically, Mr. Obama might not be able to forever insulate himself from the crimes comitted by his subordinates.

Image result for obama caught

“Judicial Watch obtained 900 pages of documents Monday showing the EPA used social media to lobby support for the Waters of the United States (WOTUS) rule. The agency used Thunderclap, a platform that shares messages across Facebook and Twitter, to recruit outside groups to generate support for various environmental policies.

“Federal law prohibits agencies from engaging in propaganda. It also forbids agencies from using federal resources to conduct grassroots campaigns that prod U.S. citizens into browbeating lawmakers to act on pending legislation.”

So, it would appear the EPA simply broke the law to pursue its objectives.

We have a suggestion for those looking into corruption sponsored by Mr. Obama, Mrs. Clinton, and their minions. Just start anywhere. It shouldn’t take long to find a smoking gun. In this case, it’s EPA officials ignoring the law to push the Obama administration’s agenda.

Image result for obama caught

“‘I don’t want it to look like EPA used our own social media accounts to reach our support goal,’ former EPA Director of Web Communications Jessica Orquina wrote in an email in 2014 to Karen Wirth, an EPA team leader in the Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water.”

As an aside, one can wonder what reaction the framers of our Constitution would have been to the suggestion that they needed to establish an “Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water?”

Back to the story at hand, we see Judicial Watch continuing to make excellent progress by filing lawsuits under FOIA.

“Judicial Watch obtained the email records through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit after the EPA failed to respond to a FOIA request in May.”

Image result for obama caught

This EPA scandal might seem like small potatoes compared to the accusations leveled against Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and their associates. And by itself, it might well be. But it is progress.

Recall Hillary’s horror and shock when she realized she lost the election to Donald Trump. Certainly, seeing her life-long goal smashed to pieces, and having her enormous ego deflated created much of that angst. But keep in mind that it also meant that her ability to thwart investigations was lost. That latter point is not one lost on Barack Obama either.

President Trump is unlikely to pervert justice to save Hillary or Obama. And they know it.

Judicial Watch is not giving up, and neither should you.

Source: Political Insider

Congressman Trey Gowdy Puts A Stop To Barack Obama’s Interference

Once it was discovered that Barack Obama had been running major surveillance through the National Security Agency (NSA)on citizens, Donald Trump and his team during the 2016 election, he knew he was going down.

Several reports had been discovered that the illegal surveillance had been done to try to break President Trump and Obama was accused of operating a ‘shadow government.’ Another strange thing was that the Obama family had purchased a mansion just blocks away from the White House, which is not something any other President has done.

Trey Gowdy had become suspicious of his acts and had begun his operation to stop Obama’s personal ‘shadow goverment.’ This is then when the surveillance operation was discovered. He ran in through the National Security Agency (NSA). The NSA is where Obama still has many of his cohorts, even while not in power anymore.

One of his cohorts, Reality Winner, was recently arrested for leaking some highly classified documents against Trump and possible collusion with Russia.

Congressman Trey Gowdy announced to Fox News’ Bill Hemmer that he is going to stop the NSA from running these programs.

We’re not going to reauthorize these surveillance programs if the American people are not satisfied that their security is not going to be safeguarded.” Gowdy said.

Gowdy expressed his concern with Obama and how he had misused these programs, “This unmasking. That is a privilege to be able to request that a U.S. person’s name be unmasked.

I want to know who’s making the request [and] what is the evidentiary basis of that request? And if it’s late in your tenure – like the day before you leave office – that should send off alarms and sirens in your head as to why that person did it.

Trey Gowdy is on top of his game and working to make sure that no one can do this again.

Do you support Trey Gowdy in putting an end to Obama’s ‘shadow government?’

Мaѕsivе DАСA Sсаndаl Rоckѕ Wаshingtоn, Whаt Тhеy Fоund Нaѕ Libеrаlѕ Ѕpeесhlеsѕ

On Tuesday, Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced something that wasn’t exactly a closely-guarded secret. President Donald Trump decided to bring an end to the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program in the next six months.

Like clockwork, shock and outrage flowed in to blast the commander-in-chief as being heartless and insensitive. This happened in spite of the fact that everyone knew it was coming.

DACA was never intended to be a permanent program. Hence, the word ‘deferred’ in its title.

It came to life under former President Barack Obama’s watch, and he essentially crammed it through and hoped it would become so accepted that everyone would forget about it.

Trump was not about to let that happen.

So how bad is it with this program? According to this former official with the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services agency, it’s a raging dumpster fire.

Breitbart reports:

Fraud is rampant and “huge” for the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, a former official with the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) agency alleges.

Under DACA, nearly 800,000 illegal aliens were given temporary protected status and work permits to remain in the United States. Experts have told Breitbart Texas that during the Obama Administration, background screening was lax.

So is this just hyperbole from an aggrieved employee that doesn’t agree with the policy? It certainly doesn’t sound that way, as he has plenty of facts to bolster his take.

In an interview with LifeZette, former USCIS manager of the agency’s investigative unit, Matt O’Brien, alleged that the fraud rate for DACA is roughly “40 to 50 percent” and potentially even “higher”:

“Based on what I had seen and what I discussed with my colleagues, the fraud rate is 40 to 50 percent. It’s possible that it was higher,” he told LifeZette this week.

As with most federal programs that are implemented in a willy nilly fashion, those that are actually tasked with implementing the program can tell you a whole lot more about.

Politicians are quite adept at selling things and making them sound good. Unfortunately, there are far too many instances in which the details on how to make the program a reality fall by the wayside.

By extension, far too many things fall through the cracks. When that happens, fraud and abuse becomes rampant.

He and the investigators working under him, called adjudicators, often found evidence that someone had lied about his DACA qualifications, but the office of the chief counsel at USCIS, he said, almost always dismissed the adjudicator’s recommendation to deny the application.

“I would say 98 percent of the time, they defaulted to approving them,” he said.

O’Brien’s assertion that USCIS often rushed to get illegal aliens on the DACA rolls matches up with previous Breitbart Texas reporting which revealed how the Obama Administration added 122,221 DACA recipients to the amnesty program in the last three months of his presidency.

That’s an alarming revelation. While social justice warriors are quick to get their britches up when it comes to immigration enforcement, there are far too many examples that show us that it’s more than needed.

It remains incredibly unclear why that’s so hard to see, or why someone would want to have such lax enforcement in the first place.

Since DACA’s inception, more than 2,100 DACA recipients saw their protected status revoked for being involved in gang activity or suspected/convicted of a felony. Due to a loophole in the DACA program, more than 39,000 illegal aliens have been able to obtain Green Cards and more than 1,000 naturalized.

The prevailing narrative from the mainstream press is that everyone covered by the DACA program is an incredibly upstanding person that has done absolutely nothing wrong.

That’s a statistical impossibility. To tug at the heartstrings even further, it’s explained that all they want is a home and whatnot.

That’s great and all, but when we’re talking about the safety of others being potentially impacted by the program, there’s obviously some things that need to be cleaned up.

Trump and his administration are setting out to do just that, and there’s really nothing more to see here.

Source: Breitbart

Аftеr Dеmѕ Ѕkip Impоrtаnt Мееting, Nеwt Gingriсh Unlеаѕhеѕ Тhеir Wоrѕt Nightmаrе

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi decided at the last minute that they would cancel a meeting with Trump on tax reform after their feelings were hurt by a Tweet the president sent out earlier in the day.

“Meeting with “Chuck and Nancy” today about keeping government open and working. Problem is they want illegal immigrants flooding into our Country unchecked, are weak on Crime and want to substantially RAISE Taxes. I don’t see a deal!”

Shortly after Trump sent out this Tweet, Schumer and Pelosi canceled the meeting and cried foul on President Trump.

“Given that the president doesn’t see a deal between Democrats and the White House, we believe the best path forward is to continue negotiating with our Republican counterparts in Congress instead.”

President Trump responded with an awesome takedown that highlights just how immature these two are.

“Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi did not show up for our meeting today. I’m not really that surprised. We have a lot of differences.”

Clearly Trump is willing to work with people that have differing opinions but the same can’t be said about Democrats in our government.

On Wednesday’s Fox & Friends, former house speaker Newt Gingrich sided with Trump and bashed Schumer and Pelosi for their immaturity. Gingirch said Trump was “smart in the way he set it up.” The move was a genius way to remind America that the whiny Democrats refuse to work with anyone but their own party.

“You know, the idea that they would give Trump this kind of an easy photo-op… he can sit there and say, ‘Well I’m trying to solve it, I wonder where they are.’”

It sounds like it’s time for an overhaul of Congress if the “leaders” elected by the people of this country refuse to do anything to move the country forward. SHARE if you agree!

Ѕanсtuаry Ѕtаtе Тo Lоsе АLL Fеdеrаl Funding – Тhеy Ѕаid Тhiѕ Соuldn’t Нaрpеn

With liberal lawmakers pushing to violate federal law, the Trump administration is finally fighting back. The DOJ has announced it will do more than just deny sanctuary cities future grants.

The evidence is overwhelming of the negative impact of illegal immigration. They import drugs and violence into the country. They jeopardize national security. And illegal immigrants drain public resources, while depriving Americans of jobs.

Yet liberal politicians still undermine the President by protecting these criminal aliens. Sanctuary cities and now states refuse to cooperate with federal law enforcement in deporting aliens.

Trump has promised retribution in the form of cutting off federal funds. Now we are learning the DOJ might actually demand back funds they granted them.

From The Federalist Papers:

How much is pandering to illegal immigrants really worth to the state of California? We may be about to find out.

Fox News reports that the Trump Justice Department has given California and its Democrat Governor, Jerry Brown, an ultimatum: you can be a sanctuary state that flouts federal immigration law or you can keep the federal tax dollars flowing … but you can’t have both:

Department of Justice Officials tell Fox News this situation could result with future federal grants being withheld from California, that threat has been a common thread in this ongoing story. However DOJ officials also tell Fox they could “clawback” funds already awarded to the Golden State.

For instance California received more than $18 million in federal grants from the Department of Justice in 2016, funds DOJ officials say could be subject to a “clawback.”

The illegal immigration issue is finally coming to a head. Governor Jerry Brown has flaunted our nation’s laws and security in order to protect criminal aliens. Americans are dying at the hands of aliens, yet Brown and other libs do nothing.

It’s high time the federal government did something about it. California has no business enjoying tax payer funds, while is undermines our national security and economy.

How much can California stand the lack of federal cash? Considering how much it depends on federal grants to fix its infrastructure, fund its government, and provide needed services, they won’t last long.

But don’t think these angry liberals will take it lying down. Most likely, they will sue the federal government–their most used recourse in this day and age. But it’s a case that won’t hold much water, even if it goes to the Supreme Court.

Source: www.wntribune.com

JUST IN: Actress Sandra Bullock To Hillary Clinton: “If You Don’t Like Our President You Can Leave And

Sandra Bullock stated that she is not “politically vocal” but rather that doesn’t mean she isn’t stubborn with regards to America’s administration.
“I simply need what’s best for our nation,” Bullock said amid a question and answer session for her new film, Our Brand Is Crisis, in Los Angeles last Friday. And the best part was when she stated this:
“If you don’t like our current President, you can leave our country and never come back, especially you Hillary.”
“Hatred is the last thing we need nowadays, we must unite. Donald Trump is doing everything he is available of to improve our nation, just respect that activity and stay patient.”
Bullock, who plays Jane “Calamity” Bodine, a political strategist, in the upcoming film, says her own particular views are shaded by her child Louis.
Sandra stated, “I would like my rights represented and those of my son – very selfish views and I think everyone else has them.”
“When this film came along, it came along at a time that I was having that internal discussion with myself about who in our country would step out of their comfort zone to help others for the greater good,” she added.

Bullock, who claims she would “do anything” for her child, stated this “constituinal analysis” hinged largely on who else, on a bigger scale, would work to perform Louis’ best advantages.
“What kind of individuals would regroup and protest for more noteworthy benefit? Have we as a whole have become excessively frightened and excessively sheltered?” she inquired.
The 51-year-old’s present political outlook was likewise affected intensely by her father. Subsequent to experiencing childhood in a split home, one parent was a Republican, the other a Democrat – she says she figured out which organization is more suitable for America.
The Oscar-winner stated that her mom “did things that were certainly relatively revolutionary, as a lady,” she was a Republican…

Source: proconservativenews.com/

Аftеr СNN Ѕаid Тhеy Wеrе Bоyсоtting Whitе Hоuѕе Сhriѕtmаѕ Pаrty, Ѕаrаh Huсkаbее Еmbаrrаѕѕеd Тhеm

Just when you thought CNN couldn’t get anymore pathetic, they sink to a whole new level. They just announced they are “boycotting” Pres. Trump’s White House Christmas Party, and Sarah Huckabee-Sanders had an epic response.

Here’s what a CNN Spokesman said:

“CNN will not be attending this year’s White House Christmas party… In light of the President’s continued attacks on freedom of the press and CNN, we do not feel it is appropriate to celebrate with him as his invited guests.”

Sarah Huckabee-Sanders saw this and immediately responded on Twitter, saying “Christmas comes early! Finally good news from CNN.”

BURNED! Sarah Huckabee-Sanders is the best! SHARE this on Facebook if you think she does a good job!

How petty and pathetic of CNN to not put Politics aside and celebrate Christmas at The White House.

Also, how presumptuous of them to think they are “sending a message” by doing this.

This comes just a couple days after she embarrassed the White House Press corps for attacking Pres. Trump over calling Sen. Warren “Pocahontas.”

MUELLER JUST MADE EVERY DEMOCRAT’S NIGHTMARE COME TRUE

Liberals were foaming at the mouth on Monday when Donald Trump’s former campaign manager Paul Manafort was indicted by White House Special Counsel Robert Mueller. Liberals thought this indictment meant that Trump’s impeachment would be imminent, but they just learned that they were dead wrong.

Freedom Daily reported that liberals were devastated when it was revealed that the indictment does not have anything that even remotely suggests there was any sort of collusion between the Russian government and Trump. In fact, Trump is not even mentioned in the indictment, and all of the charges stem from before Manafort joined his campaign.

Liberals are now trying to do everything in their power to divert attention away from Hillary Clinton’s actual collusion with Russia by twisting this Manafort scandal into an impeachable offense. Now, these liberals are going so far as to say that investigating Clinton’s Uranium One scandal is “a crime.”

The mainstream media has gone so far off the deep end that they are actually suggesting that Trump is committing a criminal act by even considering an investigation into shady Clinton dealings with the Russians. This week, MSNBC legal analyst Paul Butler laughably claimed that it “absolutely is” obstruction of justice for the government to investigate Hillary Clinton because….. Russia.

“Would these attempts to distract from the investigation, even attempting to unseal or remove the gag order from an FBI informant in order to further what is essentially a side investigation that they’re pursuing, is that in itself an element of obstruction?” host Joy Reid shockingly asked, showing that she believes selling off 20% of the countries uranium supply to Russia is a “side issue.”

This comes after it was revealed that the indictment against Manafort and his colleague Rick Gates includes 12 separate criminal counts: conspiracy against the United States, conspiracy to launder money, unregistered agent of a foreign principal, false and misleading Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) statements, false statements, and seven counts of failure to file reports of foreign bank and financial accounts.

The indictment states that Manafort and Gates “generated tens of millions of dollars in income as a result of their Ukraine work.”

“In order to hide Ukraine payments from United States authorities, from approximately 2006 through at least 2016, Manafort and Gates laundered the money through scores of United States and foreign corporations, partnerships and bank accounts,” it continues.

Manafort joined Trump’s campaign in March of 2016, but he left it in August of last year as questions about his financial dealings mounted.