REPORT: Hillary Clinton Offered Plea Deal By DOJ

You won’t see THIS on CNN.

“The Justice Department has reopened the investigation of Hillary Clinton’s mishandling of classified material on her private email system while she was secretary of state, and is considering offering her a plea bargain if she will agree to plead guilty to charges of breaking the law, according to a Clinton attorney,”

Newsmax reports.

The discussion of a plea bargain took place late last month and was offered by a high-ranking Justice Department official to the Clinton lawyer.

During the exploratory talks with the prosecutor, the Clinton attorney was told that despite former FBI Director James Comey’s decision last July not to prosecute Hillary, the Justice Department has reexamined the email case and believes there are ample grounds for prosecuting Hillary on a number of counts.

Under the Justice Department’s plea offer, Hillary would be required to sign a document admitting that she committed a prosecutable crime. In return, the DOJ would agree not to bring charges against Hillary in connection with the email probe.

Also as part of the agreement, the Justice Department would not proceed with an investigation of Hillary’s pay to play deals with foreign governments and businessmen who contributed to the Clinton Foundation or who paid Bill Clinton exorbitant speaking fees.

The Clinton attorney cautioned that normally a plea is offered by a prosecutor only upon arraignment, and Hillary has not yet been charged with any crime.

The Clinton attorney cautioned that normally a plea is offered by a prosecutor only upon arraignment, and Hillary has not yet been charged with any crime.


Barack Obama thinks of himself as the best president ever. However, that is not true at all. Although he thinks that he made America a better place to live, he did not and many Americans will agree.

He committed many crimes and he is not under investigation yet. However, that may change now since it was reported that Obama used taxpayers money to fund Anti-Trump protests and radical left organizations. Now, Trey Gowdy can put Obama behind bars at least for this crime.

Obama spent his last months boasting about how fruitful president he was. I n actuality, no one at any point felt his prosperity. Possibly he alludes to his own prosperity. All things considered, to be completely forthright, he is for sure the best president judging by his own pick up.

Then again, the American country languished over 10 years. No good thing happened to our kin, yet we saw racial, religious, social and scholarly polarity, bigger than each some time recently.

The unparalleled “layer” of our general public who ourished from Obama’s lead was the 1%. The colossal enterprises and their proprietors made an inconspicuous benet outside the USA, in a similar time, they utilized the advantages of the American money and the American economy.

The corporations paid back. Today, WNP reported that Barack Obama used slush funds for supporting Anti-Trump protest and also, for nancing the radical left organizations in the USA.
“It’s clear partisan politics played a role in the illicit actions that were made.

The DOJ is the last place this should have occurred,” Rep. John Ratcliffe, R-Texas, explained. He was also referring to many donations to imminent people in the DOJ from the liberal left. Today many of these people are directly involved in Trump-Russia case. Coincidence? I don’t think so…

“Advocated for big government and progressive power are using the Justice Department to extort money from corporations. It’s a shakedown. It’s corrupt, pure and simple,” added Tom Fitton from Judicial Watch.

However, Obama used his slush funds and the damage is already done. We talk about his crimes all the time, but we need ACTION!

Share this post in order to encourage the GOP members to unite and start a serious procedure in getting Barack Obama before the face of justice. Trey Gowdy- now you have the chance to keep your promise! Obama abused his power and the DOJ to suck money from the corporations and fund antiAmerican activities.

Please Share this if you support Trey Gowdy!

Source: /


Not long ago, a rumor was circulating that President Barack Obama would be replacing George Washington on the $1 bill this year. That rumor was later proven to be false, although some new bill designs (including $20 featuring Harriet Tubman) are in the works.
We’re sure liberals were thrilled with the prospect of Obama being on their dollars, but the truth is, the Bureau of Engraving and Printing say the dollar is fine as is because it’s rarely the target of counterfeiting. The U.S. Treasury also prevent living people from being on currency notes.

Sorry Obama, but we won’t have to look at your face every day anymore. What do you think? Are you relieved this rumor is false?

RUSH DROPS NUKE – Reveals The TRUE Identity Of Barack H. Obama

The mainstream media has been desperately trying to destroy Donald Trump for months. Now, they have become so desperate to take him down that they have resorted to reporting fake news on him.

Last week, conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh said he has finally had enough.

After Trump issued his “laptop ban,” which banned certain electronics from being brought on aircrafts flying out of terror-risk Middle Eastern countries, the mainstream media tried to make this look “xenophobic.” Rush began his discussion of this by reading from a Washington Post piece entitled “Trump Won’t Allow You to Use iPads or Laptops on Certain Airlines.”

“Trump,” Rush stressed, according to Daily Wire. “Donald Trump is denying you, if you’re on a certain airline flying into the United States, Donald Trump is denying you the chance to use your electronic device.”

He continued reading the following quote from the article:
From Tuesday on, passengers traveling to the U.S. from 10 airports in eight Muslim-majority countries will not be allowed to have iPads, laptops or any communications device larger than a smartphone in the cabin of the plane. If you are traveling from Egypt, Jordan, Kuwait, Morocco, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, or the UAE on Egypt Air, Emirates, Etihad Airways, Kuwait Airways, Qatar Airways, Royal Air Maroc, Royal Jordanian Airlines, Saudi Arabian Airlines, or Turkish Airlines, and you want to use your laptop on the flight, you are probably out of luck.

So why is the United States doing this, and how can it get away with it?

“Don’t you mean why is Trump doing this and how can Trump get away with it?” asked Rush. “Well, the story here says that the U.S. says it’s not all about security. There is an alternative explanation.”

The next part of the article suggested that the banning of laptops by “Trump” might just be about “retaliation:”

Three of the airlines that have been targeted for these measures — Emirates, Etihad Airways and Qatar Airways — have long been accused by their U.S. competitors of receiving massive effective subsidies from their governments. These airlines have been quietly worried for months that President Trump was going to retaliate. This may be the retaliation. …The United States is weaponizing interdependence.

Rush pointed out that the British are also barring laptops and tablets from cabins on some international flights, something that the mainstream media is leaving out of their coverage.

“Wait, there’s another government involved here?” said Rush. “Wait, wait, wait, wait. We just kind of read ‘U.S. and British officials.’ You mean the Brits have instituted the same ban on electronic devices on certain airliners coming into the U.K. just like we have in the U.S.? Well, shazam! It looks like somebody other than Trump is doing the same thing Trump’s doing. I wonder if Trump’s making ’em do it.”

“So we are now being led to believe that Donald Trump colluded with the U.K. to deny airplane passengers the right to use their laptops, their iPads, and their iPhones,” he added mockingly. “Is that right? U.K., United States, Trump colludes with everybody.”

“[D]o you know what this really is about? ‘Cause I have that here,” said Limbaugh, who then destroyed the liberal articles by detailing the actual facts behind the “laptop ban:”

Rush: “Laptop ban on flights ‘is based on intelligence about an ISIS plot to target the West gathered during the raid on Yemen which killed Navy SEAL’. The intelligence centered around al-Qaeda’s ‘successful development’ of compact battery bombs that fit inside laptops or other devices, sources claimed.”

In other words, there is a credible threat. It is a credible threat based on intel that was gathered during the raid in Yemen, in January, a raid that Obama had approved before he left office. The military commanders said they couldn’t launch until they had a new moon. They needed a totally dark sky. There wasn’t a new moon until after Trump was inaugurated. Trump signed off on the deal. He had nothing to do with the strategy, the actual operation. He just signed off on it.

The raid was conducted and we know the details. They somehow knew we were coming, claiming they heard the drone of our drones, they heard the sound, and a SEAL was killed and the terrorists were hiding and dressed as men and women and children and so forth inside mosques or what have you. And everybody proclaimed the mission an abject failure. Trump said, “No, no, there was some really valuable intel gathered.” People pooh-poohed Trump as insane, stupid, and a lying sack of you know what.

It turns out there was intel gathered, and the intel gathered from the raid claimed that ISIS has perfected bombs that work and go inside batteries, inside electronic devices that you would use on the cabin of an airplane: a laptop, an iPad, or an iPhone. And when they learned of this intel, they banned flights from 10 different countries where the intel said people had been perfecting this.

There is a solid, specific reason for this to happen. It’s not because Trump hates anybody. It’s not because Trump doesn’t want you using your iPhone. It’s not because Trump’s flipping off the business community. It’s not because Trump’s a xenophobe or a bigot. It’s because there was a credible threat in both the U.K. and the United States.

And the only place that you will find the details of that story is in the U.K. Daily Mail. You won’t see it in the New York Times. You won’t see it in the Washington Post. You won’t see it anywhere in America because the objective is not to tell the truth. The objective is to destroy Trump.

SHARE this story if you agree with Rush Limbaugh!

Source> |  averific

Sаnсtuаry Ѕtаtе Тo Lоѕe АLL Fеderаl Funding – Тhey Ѕaid Тhiѕ Сouldn’t Haрpеn

With liberal lawmakers pushing to violate federal law, the Trump administration is finally fighting back. The DOJ has announced it will do more than just deny sanctuary cities future grants.

The evidence is overwhelming of the negative impact of illegal immigration. They import drugs and violence into the country. They jeopardize national security. And illegal immigrants drain public resources, while depriving Americans of jobs.

Yet liberal politicians still undermine the President by protecting these criminal aliens. Sanctuary cities and now states refuse to cooperate with federal law enforcement in deporting aliens.

Trump has promised retribution in the form of cutting off federal funds. Now we are learning the DOJ might actually demand back funds they granted them.

From The Federalist Papers:

How much is pandering to illegal immigrants really worth to the state of California? We may be about to find out.

Fox News reports that the Trump Justice Department has given California and its Democrat Governor, Jerry Brown, an ultimatum: you can be a sanctuary state that flouts federal immigration law or you can keep the federal tax dollars flowing … but you can’t have both:

Department of Justice Officials tell Fox News this situation could result with future federal grants being withheld from California, that threat has been a common thread in this ongoing story. However DOJ officials also tell Fox they could “clawback” funds already awarded to the Golden State.

For instance California received more than $18 million in federal grants from the Department of Justice in 2016, funds DOJ officials say could be subject to a “clawback.”

The illegal immigration issue is finally coming to a head. Governor Jerry Brown has flaunted our nation’s laws and security in order to protect criminal aliens. Americans are dying at the hands of aliens, yet Brown and other libs do nothing.

It’s high time the federal government did something about it. California has no business enjoying tax payer funds, while is undermines our national security and economy.

How much can California stand the lack of federal cash? Considering how much it depends on federal grants to fix its infrastructure, fund its government, and provide needed services, they won’t last long.

But don’t think these angry liberals will take it lying down. Most likely, they will sue the federal government–their most used recourse in this day and age. But it’s a case that won’t hold much water, even if it goes to the Supreme Court.

Аftеr Rеpоrtеr Тriеѕ tо Саtсh Ѕаrаh In а Liе, Аll Hеll Brеаkѕ Lооѕе

During the on-camera White House press briefing yesterday, press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders was suffering from a cold and was not putting up with any shenanigans from the reporters in the room.

The last question of the day is when Sarah finally put her hand up and dropped a huge truth-bomb on CBS News’ Margaret Brennan for asking what was a question that proved to waste everyone’s time.

Brennan was asking about a comment Huckabee made earlier and she was trying to lead Sarah to disclose whether Secretary of State Rex Tillerson may be getting replaced in the near future based on rumors going through the news networks yesterday morning.

“You have repeatedly said that Tillerson helped to “close out a successful year.” Are you saying that he will close out the year or will he serve beyond that?”

Sarah’s answer is one of her best yet!

“I mean, we are all closing out the year. You’re closing out the year in your news network. We don’t set the calendar. That’s something that happened a few centuries ago. The year is going to end whether we like it or not – we are all going to close it out and we are all going to do the very best job we can for the American people in that process. I don’t mean anything by it more than that. I’m closing out the year; you guys are. I know most of you are doing end of the year stories because that’s how the calendar works.”

These press briefings are moving into the ridiculous category where poor Sarah has to waste her time, even while she is sick, to educate these reporters on how a calendar works!

SHARE this if you think Sarah should start kicking these reporters out for asking DUMB questions!

President Trump Makes Major White House Change!

President Trump promised fiscal responsibility within government, using tax-payer monies wisely.

And he is delivering on that promise.

On Sunday, it was announced that the Trump administration is cutting it’s own budget by $22 million — in effect, Trump is leading the way by cutting funds to the White House, his current residence.

The Democrat party and the mainstream media have been oddly quiet about this big change…

Breitbart reports:

The savings come from a cut in the amount spent on Michelle Obama’s budget as First Lady, an end to the large number of “czars” and so-called “fellowships” that Obama employed, and a smaller White House workforce, Forbes magazine reported.

After the White House released its annual budget report last week, Adam Andrzejewski, president of government watchdog group, compared the newly reported budget to the last two years of the Obama administration.

Andrzejewski (pronounced And-gee-eff-ski) noted that there are now 110 fewer White House employees since Obama left office, saving nearly $5 million alone.

Also, the First Lady’s staff has been cut from 24 staffers to only five. Michelle Obama entered the White House with a staff of 22 costing nearly $2 million annually, up from the $1.4 million spent during the George W. Bush era.

Another area of savings was the elimination of the so-called policy “czars” with which Obama stocked the White House staff. The Trump budget shows not a single “czar” employed for 2017.

Trump also seems to have ended Obama’s shady “fellowship” positions, people responsible for such special programs as Michelle Obama’s “Let Girls Learn” initiative and others. Some of these “fellowship” candidates in Obama’s administration made up to $158,000 annually.

Latest Plot Revealed: Liberals Plan To Wipe Out Senior Citizens’ Right To Vote In A Single Bold Move, Trump Says Hell NO!

One thing that ought not to be a subject of debate in America is the question of who gets the right to vote. While it was once a topic of great debate in the U.S., especially regarding former slaves as well as women, that has been settled. Constitutional amendments have seen to that. And they were the correct way to settle the issue.

Progressives naturally do not like the Constitution as they correctly see it as an impediment to their liberal agenda. This is exactly what the Constitution is supposed to do. It also illustrates why efforts by leftist federal judges to reinterpret the Constitution’s plain and original meaning must be defeated.

Liberals have noticed that the elderly, as a group, tend to vote conservatively. As a result, we are hearing cries that they be prohibited from voting for conjured and spurious reasons such as an alleged lack of interest in education. This has gotten a push in Canada, but we can expect the left in the US to embrace it as well. And if one is considered too old to vote, can it be much distance to travel before we arrive at euthanasia for seniors who have allegedly outlived their usefulness to society? A more horrific idea is hard to imagine – other than its corollary at the other end of the age spectrum, abortion.

Image result for elderly voting

“For many years liberals have decried voter ID laws, insisting that the disenfranchise minority voters, particularly those who are poor or elderly.

“Yet while they shout from one side of their mouth that everyone — including non-citizens — should be allowed to vote in our elections, out of the other side of their mouths they are grumbling about how the elderly no longer deserve the right to vote, since they don’t vote progressive enough.”

Image result for elderly voting united state

Here is this twisted thinking exposed in a bit more detail.

“The topic was raised in July by Canadian outlet Maclean’s, with author Daniel Munro considering various arguments as to why the elderly should have their voting rights revoked at some point, such as around 70-years-old.

“‘The idea is that once citizens reach a certain age, they will be less concerned with our social, political, and economic future than younger generations and much less likely to bear the long-term consequences of political decisions and policies,’ Munro wrote. ‘In that case, their votes ought to be discounted, or eliminated altogether, to ensure that the future is shaped by those who have a real stake in how it turns out.’”

Image result for seniors voting united states

Or, elderly people often have the experience and wisdom to see through dangerous policies and initiatives, and as a result, vote against those who promote causes such as gay marriage, open immigration, and abortion.

This can be summarized very simply. The left is finding its agenda obstructed. In order to move things to the left at an accelerating speed, liberals must dislodge those supporting traditional, conservative values.

They run the numbers and see that if everyone of retirement age and above no longer voted, their progressive agenda would pass. Hence, they salivate at the idea of getting the elderly off the voting rolls – one way or another.

Thus exposed for the frauds they are, the liberals’ abhorrent idea must be defeated. With a president who is in his senior years, and who is a lot sharper than these liberal misanthropes, we can be confident that the left will get nowhere with such plans.

Source: Conservative Tribune

Trey Gowdy Is About To Unleash Hell: House Investigators Discovered 112 Bank Transactions And Records Were Withheld From Them To Protect…

It is very frustrating to know important truth is out there, yet at the same time to be impeded in one’s efforts to grasp it. This is the case we have with the fake dossier that was created to implicate President Trump in illegal, yet non-existent contacts with Russia.

This phony document was just one part of what was one of the most vicious presidential elections in memory. One has to wonder if there was anything Hillary would not have done or ordered to facilitate a victory. Her presumed immunity to being held responsible for her actions is the thing of legends. And President Trump is a fighter who cannot be expected to put up with anything he doesn’t like. So the level of conflict we witnessed was assured.

Into this electoral turmoil came Fusion GPS, the so-called research firm serving Democratic Party interests. It remains at the center of this fake dossier scandal. If its executives and staff did nothing wrong as they claim, their suspicious behavior demands some explaining. Behavior such as trying to withhold bank records subpoenaed by the House. And when that didn’t work, 112 transactions have been found to be missing from what the firm did release. Congressman Trey Gowdy is not going to tolerate this behavior for long.

Image result for trey gowdy mad

According to the Washington Times, “Fusion and the House at first worked out a deal for relevant banks records. But House lawyers say they learned that Fusion withheld 112 transactions pertinent to the Russia probe.

“The suspect transactions, House lawyers say, deal with two Russia issues. One is the dossier. The other is Fusion’s payments from another law firm, BakerHostetler. That money came from the Russian firm Prevezon Holdings which is lobbying Washington to repeal a law that brought stiff economic sanctions on President Vladimir Putin’s regime.

“In that vein, the House committee wants copies of Fusion bank transfers with other law firms in addition to Perkins Coie and Hostetler.”

Image result for fusion gps

And here’s one conclusion the Times reports that the House committee has come to: “‘Fusion has established a pattern and practice of using law firms as intermediaries to mask the true beneficiaries of its research,’ the House filing says.”

It would seem that in serving its Democratic beneficiaries, that Fusion has woven a very complicated web of financial transactions. If everything were legitimate, why all this extraordinary shuffling of money among law firms in addition to the efforts to conceal records from the House subpoena?

As much as Fusion’s Democratic clients would prefer otherwise, a federal judge has just unsealed documents giving us some insight into what was going on at Fusion.

“On Tuesday, a federal court unsealed Fusion GPS’s bank records, shining new light on Russia-related payments made by the firm behind the infamous ‘Trump dossier.’

“Judge Richard Leon, a Bush-appointee, unsealed the records, showing 112 transactions involving Fusion GPS.

“‘Perkins Coie, the law firm that represented the Clinton campaign and DNC, paid Fusion a total of $1,024,408 between May 24, 2016 and Dec. 28, 2016, the records show,’ reports Chuck Ross of the Daily Caller.”

Image result for dnc headquarters

Turning to the Daily Caller, we learn that “[t]he unsealed documents also reveal details of the House committee’s requests for records related to Fusion’s payments to journalists.

“The document shows that the committee sought records related to ‘five Fusion payments to research and Russia expert [name redacted], and production of three additional payments.’

“[…]The unsealed filings show that Fusion argued against releasing records related to payments to journalists.”

The noose tightens. Justice may be delayed, but it looks like it will make up for its tardiness by the severity and scope of the penalties and punishment it will eventually exact for a growing number of actors. Actors who were tasked with winning an election no matter how many laws had to be broken.

We await the final act in this drama with great eagerness.

Source: Gateway Pundit

Ѕarаh Iѕ ВAСK! Аftеr Rероrtеr Ѕuggеstѕ Тrumр iѕ Inсomреtеnt, Аll НЕLL Вreаkѕ Lоosе!

Sarah Huckabee Sanders is BACK! After nearly a month since the last White House press briefing, Press Secretary Sanders returned to the podium ready to take on the room of biased reporters. During Thursday’s press briefing, questions of the border wall and Afghanistan dominated the period of questioning.

However, in the midst of these topics, one reporter seemed to try and stir up some unnecessary conflict – for no reason of course. He randomly brought up a recent attack on President Trump from GOP Senator Bob Corker.

Last week, Corker released a harsh statement on Trump’s competency for his position. Corker’s mindless critiques made headlines in mainstream media.

“The president has not yet been able to demonstrate the stability nor some of the competence that he needs to demonstrate in order to be successful. He also recently has not demonstrated that he understands the character of this nation. He has not demonstrated that he understands what has made this nation great and what it is today … and without the things that I just mentioned happening, our nation is going to go through great peril.” 

It becomes clear that the reporter was simply trying to mess with Sanders by referencing this particular statement, but Sanders shuts him down completely with ONE AMAZING sentence.

“I think that’s a ridiculous and outrageous claim and doesn’t dignify a response from this podium,” Sanders immediately shot back at him.

Boom! Sarah is back! And she’s not going to take any nonsense from reporters trying to throw our great President under the bus. These types of questions from reporters are a complete WASTE OF TIME, and it is so satisfying to see Sanders dismiss them so quickly.

God bless Sarah for her true loyalty to President Trump!